2010 FIFA World Cup Standard Very High.


Viva the Champions.

The 2010 FIFA World Cup football standards has been seen by many as below par. That is as ill-informed informed as people who first criticised the ball Jabulani because they perceived it to be a South African product, or those who waste their energy on anti-vuvuzela campaigns because the hear the buzz on Television.

By now, you know Germany’s Adidas made the ball for FIFA and you saw how the Maanshaft scored with that ball. Crazy enough, the ball was made a year before the World Cup and no league bothered to enforce the use of the ball. South Africa had to use it in the last few games. Next time Associations make sponsorship deals with their ball suppliers, there must be a provision to use a World Cup ball in the year of the World Cup. The Vuvuzela issue, learn to blow one and you are addicted. 

There was so much improvement upwards in the game that those who watched the matches with their hearts and bias to their Superpower teams missed out. In comparison to other tournaments, the gap between the best in the world and the minnows was so huge that matches would be one-sided, making obvious entertainment to an ordinary fan.

In this year’s tournament, one needs to look at the Asians teams in particular. They made it difficult for big brothers of the game to play, not by shaolin football of the Dutch, but by raised technical and tactical standards. Korea DPR made Brazil look very ordinary, losing 1-2. Japan almost got to the quarter-final, losing in a penalty shoot-out. South Korea gave excellent performances they can be proud of. New Zealand are the only team at the 2010 FIFA World Cup that did not lose a match. Incredible indeed.

If you look at how the small teams squeezed the results and ejecting big footballing nations off the driving seats, you understand how much of age they have come. Champions Italy, Brazil, Argentina, USA, France and England clearly meant business in their qualifiers until they arrived in Mzansi, but so did Ghana, Japan, Switzerland, Korea DPR and New Zealand.

With light weight Uruguay getting into the top 4, Diego Forlan, and not Messi or Ronaldo getting the Golden Ball and Asamoah Gyan of Ghana out-shooting all strikers are some of the things that must make one think about the level of competition.

When the standards improve, the small nations move up to catch up with those who had monopolised the game for so long. The fact that two teams that had never won the World Cup played the final is another testimony of the high standards of football. It would be nice to see the revolution of football especially in Africa forging ahead.

Where do you think the Asians got it right and what can Africa do to match the Ghana performance?

Advertisements

One comment on “2010 FIFA World Cup Standard Very High.

  1. Thanks for the comment. I thought that the Asians are all improving but South Korea were unlucky to come up against Argentina and then Uruguay who were both on top form, and Japan, obviously only lost on penalties.
    From Africa, getting 4 points from their group was an achievement for South Africa, but Ivory Coast were too negative against Portugal, a game which they could have won. With players like Yaya Toure, Kalou and Drogba, Ivory Coast should have reached round two.
    With more and more players joining European clubs, this is the time for Asian and African nations to start to shine.

    More of my thoughts and World Cup blogs, including my story of the World Cup at colinhenrys.wordpress.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s